Bahahaha! Amy Howe: "To answer another question, yes, Paul Clement
argued on behalf of Arizona in the case, against Solicitor General Don
Verrilli. In general, if you don't know who argued a case, Paul Clement
is always a good guess"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(53)
-
▼
June
(38)
- "It's not Marbury. It's a very naughty boy."This m...
- The mighty Ed Whelan has noticed it too.He also ta...
- Spooky. Whereas in Casey, the Rehnquist dissent bo...
- I haven't posted in a couple of hours b/c I'm work...
- Amy Howe (Scotusblog: "Yes, a commenter notes that...
- My prediction about the outcome was basically righ...
- A small consolation is that a majority holds that ...
- Of course, if Obamacare remains politically unpopu...
- I was wrong on only one point: the renegade was Ro...
- Tom Goldstein (Scotusblog):"The bottom line: the ...
- No title
- Scotusblog says: "CJ Roberts joins the left of the...
- Not even clear yet who's writing, but sounds like ...
- Taking Scotusblog a long time to parse, which is N...
- Individual mandate okayed as a tax.
- Apparently Healthcare opinion is very thick (Ameri...
- Kennedy delivers Alvarez (Stolen Valor Act) opinio...
- Scotusblog dealing with rumors - unsubstantiated a...
- Last night, a good time was had by all with Twitte...
- At blogging station. Note: healthcare case is not ...
- Warning to conservatives: remember 1992.At the end...
- According to WaPo blogger Ezra Klein, it'll be The...
- Obamacare decision on Thursday, it seems. Was goin...
- Bahahaha! Amy Howe: "To answer another question, y...
- Apparently STILL NO HEALTHCARE DECISION TODAY. Ari...
- Montana case defying Citizens United summarily rev...
- Juvenile sentencing case. A majority (I'm guessing...
- Citizens United majorly lives. Montana challenge s...
- Welcome. If you're here, you're probably not here,...
- Knox v. SEIU -- another Alito opinion for the Cour...
- Southern Union. Another crim pro case that scrambl...
- Just a note before this morning's S.Ct. copy-dump....
- Scalia and WickardWe may get the Obamacare decisio...
- Kagamania: the lady's loaded for bear! What was th...
- The Williams v. Illinois plurality opinion could b...
- So if I'm reading Williams v. Illinois right so fa...
- Williams v. Illinois: bad Confrontation Clause res...
- Watching Court opinion delivery via Scotusblog thi...
-
▼
June
(38)
Popular Posts
-
Williams v. Illinois: bad Confrontation Clause result, but not a major setback: plurality only. Alito writes for plurality. Dissenting coali...
-
Individual mandate okayed as a tax.
-
Beyond what I wrote yesterday about Perry (which now seems improbable in light of Kennedy's blather for the Court in Windsor, and Scalia...
-
My prediction about the outcome was basically right, but I was seriously wrong about, and unfair to, Justice Kennedy. Not only would he stri...
-
Scotusblog dealing with rumors - unsubstantiated and unlikely, TBTG -- that Pres will attend Court session. That could actually raise separa...
-
The mighty Ed Whelan has noticed it too. He also takes on the question: who in fact wrote the "joint dissent"? Ed first floats th...
-
The Wall Street Journal agrees with me -- and explains, better than I did or probably could, exactly why the taxing power discovered in the ...
-
Back now.I. Obamacare and RaichWhile we're watching and analyzing the Obamacare oral arguments, I'll add only this: I see no reason ...
-
The Williams v. Illinois plurality opinion could be subtitled "Trial Judges Never Get Confused." That's certainly an assumptio...
-
Tom Goldstein (Scotusblog): "The bottom line: the entire ACA is upheld, with the exception that the federal government's power to ...